萬佛城金剛菩提海 Vajra Bodhi Sea

金剛菩提海:首頁主目錄本期目錄

Vajra Bodhi Sea: HomeMain IndexIssue Index

《專文介紹 》

 

Special Features

阿姜蘇美度在萬佛城的三場講演之二:
生命、解脫與快樂(續)
THE SECOND OF THREE TALKS GIVEN BY AJAHN SUMEDHO AT THE CITY OF TEN THOUSAND BUDDHAS-­LIFE, LIBERTY, AND HAPPINESS (CONTIUED)

1999年5月2日星期日下午於道源堂
 
SPOKEN ON THE AFTERNOON OF MAY 2, 1999, DAO叩AN HALL,
CITY OF TEN THOUSAND BUDDHAS
王青楠博士 中譯 CHINESE TRANSLATION BY QINGNAN WANG, PH.D.

泰國的寺院,大自然豐富多彩。泰國是世界的溫室,甚麼都長,到處是數不清的白蟻、螞蟻、蟲子、蜘蛛、蛇等等,而和尚持不殺生戒,又必須生活在大自然中。在泰國叢林中,你一下子發現自己被這些討厭的東西圍繞,同時阿姜查在談從苦中的解脫。這很有趣,我想,「他為什麼要談從苦中解脫? 」顯然人道是痛苦的,白蟻、螞蟻、蚊子等所有的麻煩,阿姜查也面對著,可他就不為其苦;他能感覺得到這些東西,他不可能麻木。對於這些生命,他心中沒有怒火、怨恨、報復的情緒。我清楚地體悟到這是他與常人的差別所在;他能承受得住感官世界的困擾;對於衰老、病痛、沮喪、感受到的無盡困擾,他都能承受,不起苦惱。這對我太有啟發性了,我認識到這是個敏感的世間;在這裏,苦樂註定並存的;在世間這一道,我們經驗到這些是很自然的。  

這與得到人身有甚麼關係呢?有意識感官的人身,不斷地承受著某種形式的連續不斷的衝擊。這是種什麼景象呢?它影響著我們,不是嗎?看到美麗或可怕的東西,我們就有所感受;聲音或許悅耳,令人愉快,粗腔橫調,高聲柔和,氣味香臭,食品好吃或難吃,人身對所有的一切都很敏感;通過肉身,我們感到冷熱、饑渴、苦樂;心靈上,我們的執著是甚麼?我們執著於負面的念頭,如果我們執著忿怒、怨恨、嫉妒、恐懼、捨不下的事、憂慮,就會 一直感到苦惱。這些執,癡迷,都屬地 獄界,是我們心念造成。我們執著於善、美、真、理想,我們就會得到一些快樂;如果我們執著於善,我們對生活就會感到快樂、積極、樂觀許多。

對快樂沒有執著的佛,他指出「執著」本身就是問題。對我而言,這是佛所教的最有意義的道理了。他對苦因一執著於欲望一的強調,講述最詳盡;而不是欲望,欲望不是苦 因,而是「執著」於欲望。在如此眾多的教理及其他宗教之中,我發現當提到苦時,人通常都會抱怨些甚麼;他們說,「那個人讓我痛苦。白蟻和蚊子讓我苦惱;我苦惱是因為食物不好、慢性疾病、或者失去親人。」佛指出,執著這些想法才會有苦,我認為這很有意義。比如過去我常常想,「我已經當了個好和尚,怎麼還在受苦? 」「我是個好和尚,守規矩,刻苦修行,做種種對的事,可是還在受苦。」我以為當了和尚,如果做各種對的事,我就不再會有苦惱;這是種執著,執著於做各種對的事。

在做和尚的第六年,我才把這個問題弄清楚。當時我為做個好和尚而自豪。那年我離開阿姜查到泰國海灣的一個島上;有人介紹我去見那裡的一位Tubong和尚,按說他應該指示我一個好地方去修行。我和他住了一段時間,後來不得不離開。後來聽說他告訴別的和尚,說我不是個好和尚。我火冒三丈,真想回去朝他臉上打一拳。原因在哪?就是「執著」,不是嗎?這是執著,對善的執著也算;對無明的執著,執著於傳統、南傳、北傳、泰國森林傳統、師父,這些種種都可能被執著;於是就有了苦惱。

佛陀教授的四聖諦、緣起,是要你用來觀照而不是來相信的,對此我已經觀照了多年。我開始看到,因為對理想的執著,我給自己製造了多少痛苦!比如做方丈,我有種種責任;因為我要負責任,所以我感到擔子沉重;開始還好--「現在這個廟由我負責了! 「可是過了一段時間之後,事情不是都那麼順利,有了問題或困難時,你就會想,「我受夠了,我 不想幹了。這些責任我承擔夠了。」我開始意識到,苦起於執著,即使執著於善的、正確的,負責任的事也不例外。責任並不是問題,「執著」才是問題,才是苦因。人一旦認識這一點,就有了放下的智慧;放下並不是說不負責任,而是不再苦惱,不因有責任而造出苦惱:這是內心的解脫。心得到解脫了,對不對?即使是暴君式的觀點,也很容易化成嘲諷式的。

Dukkha〈苦〉,它雖然被翻譯成苦,可 是巴利文字面的意思為難以忍受。Du總是意味著負面的事,像苦惱、困難等不好的事。比如,在泰國北部做和尚,我開始留意我的生活 ,它並非那麼令人興奮。有時我想我再也忍不下去了,實際上我卻還在忍受著。你不該相信那種尖銳叫苦的聲音。在那一刻,我意識到這是苦,我在自找苦吃。如果我能忍受,這熱惱就是可以忍下來的。「我忍受不了」才是苦惱 。這些都要通過觀照才會明白;這都需要你傾 聽內在不斷發出的聲音:「我不喜歡這個人,我不要那個,事情應該這樣。那個人應該那樣才對。我受夠了,我不能忍受了。」我再也不相信了,這些都是完全靠不住的。

等你明白了這一點,就能看見實情與這些心聲是有所不同。不過要看清事實,或許得面對種種困難、痛苦、不愉快、不公平、不公道,甚至於殘酷。我們都會感到被迫害、遭虐待、不尊重、受羞辱;而且在有生之年,我們可能還會經驗這些。這是佛所說的苦,還是我們 因為境界而造出的苦?這樣觀照心就覺悟了,對不對?要能覺悟,是要靠你自己突然意識到 :只要你不願意受苦,你就可以不受。這和你所遇到的境界無關,因為所遇到的境界往往是你無法改變的;可是你可以選擇做什麼反應,這就是解脫。你不是孤立無援的受害者,不是被俘獲在陷阱裏,毫無智慧和希望,不只是處於絕望之中;認識到這點,你就會快樂。我們有這種覺悟的潛力,它永遠伴隨著我們,現在 就是如此。你對這點能有越多的觀照和欣賞, 你就開始會真正相信它。                                                                     

除此之外,一切都在變化的有為法界中,你沒有其他任何東西可以相信。你希望改變的 事,卻總是不變,對不對?現在已到了世紀末 ,有所謂Y2K〈2000年〉電腦問題,我們遇到種種對未來的威脅。我們人口眾多,可是卻缺乏智慧。這些都在問我們,世界的問題何在?我的問題何在?你的問題何在?所有一切事物的問題何在?執著於所有這些負面的感受,會使我們消極、絕望。我們可以說不是這樣,我們是積極的,「一切都會變好。黃金時代要到了,世紀末,Y2K問題轉禍為福。未來的千年,我們將享有社會、政治、經濟的和諧。」執著於這些事而非一些消極的東西,顯然要聰明得多。可是從智慧上講,迴光返照的心是兩面都照見的。人從直觀上可看出一切有為法都是無常的,因為你要通過修習正念,覺照來向內觀照,覺悟實相,這就是佛法的核心。佛將繫念、覺醒的心境做為中心內容,這是極有意義的。

佛陀意為覺者,這並不僅是要睜開眼睛而己,因為即使睜著眼睛,你仍會被自己念頭所造出來的染污境界所因,信以為真而造作種種業。當你的心是覺醒的,專注於當下、依照佛的教導來傾聽、觀察、參究、觀照,分辨,對你就是輕而易舉的。佛的教導智慧超絕,它直指我們的問題所在--無明、欲望、執著;只要我們覺悟了苦的因,就可以得到解脫。從我們自己的習慣〈因緣和合而有的〉、心念和社會文化的條件、偏見和看法的執著中,能認識到我們純淨的本性,彼此同為一體,我們就可以找到解脫。即使在有限量的人道中,無論你的現狀如何,殘障或未受過教育都不成問題,這些在有為法界都不會障礙我們找到解脫,除非你決意去執著狀況。障礙出自我們決意的執著與不明白。

佛教在當代是最為對機的,其實在所有的時代都對機。然而,現代人類已經感到失落了,陷入了自己的迷癡和貪著之中,並樂於相互毀滅,相互剝削。

而且世界人口極為龐大,五十年後或許會加倍;我們應如何相處?如何共用這個星球?如果只是以看法,或者以強凌弱,那樣只會產生無盡的痛苦。在遂道的那一端是有   光明的,在我看來,那就是佛的教導。我以此做為希望與方向所在,因為只有佛法可以留存得下來。當和尚之後,我發現能讓我有信心的只有佛法。我按著這種見地所進行的努力,都是很值得的。實際上我沿著這個方向發展,個人獲益良多。因此我想與你們分享這些,鼓勵大家認識到:確實有些事,我們都能夠有所做為。我不是來自火星或木星的怪人;我來自〈美國〉華盛頓州西雅圖市;我是西雅圖人。

我今天下午就講這些,供大家思考。 

 

Nature is abundant in the Thai monastery. Thailand is the world's incubator; everything grows. There are so many termites, ants, bugs, spiders, snakes and everything all over the place; yet you have to live in nature as Buddhist monks who don't kill anything or destroy life. Suddenly you find yourself living in a Thai jungle with all these annoying and irritating things, and Ajahn Chah is talking about freedom from suffering. This is an interesting one. I thought, "Why is he teaching this freedom from suffering?" Obviously this realm is the realm of suffering. One could see that Ajahn Chah had the same problems with termites, ants, mosquitoes and all the rest, yet he didn't seem to suffer from them. He could still feel them; it wasn't like he was insensitive. His mind wasn't creating anger, resentment, hatred, revenge toward any of these creatures- that was the difference which became very clear to me. He could bear the irritations of the sensory world, with the aging process, with the diseases, with the frustrations, with the endless irritations on his senses, without creating suffering. That was quite a revelation to me, to recognize that this realm is a sensitive realm and in the sensitive realm you have to have both pleasure and pain, happiness and suffering. This is a realrn where these are natural to this experience.

What is it to have a human body? A conscious human body with sense organs is continuously being impinged on in some way. What does that look like? It affects us, doesn't it? If we see something that is beautiful or hideous, we feel it. In sound, it can be melodic or pleasant, cacophonous, loud or soft; odors can be fragrant or stinking; food can be delicious or horrible; the body is a totally sensitive thing, isn't it? It gets hot and cold. It gets hungry and thirsty and feels pleasure and pain through the physical body. Let's look at the mind: what are our mental attachments? We attach to negative thoughts. If we attach to anger, resentment, jealousy, fear, things that obsess our minds, despair and worry and anxiety, then we suffer over time. This means that we're suffering all the time. These attachments and obsessions are in the hell realm, which we actually create in our minds. If we attach to goodness, beauty, truth, the ideals, then these tend to give us some happiness. If we attach to the good, then we tend to be a lot happier, positive and optimistic about life.  

The Buddha, however, went even beyond attachment to happiness, pointing to the very act of attachment as the problem, this very act of attachment. This is the most significant of the Buddha's teaching, for me anyway, and most accurate is his emphasis on the cause of suffering: the attachment to desires. Not even desire, desire's not the cause; it's the attachment to desire. I notice in so many teachings and so many other religions, people talk about suffering and are usually blaming something. They say, that person is the cause of my suffering. The termites or mosquitoes make me suffer. I suffer because of the bad food, because of a chronic pain, or because of the loss of a loved one. I think the Buddha was pointing to the attachment to these perceptions as the cause of suffering, and that's very significant. Being a monk, for example, I used to wonder why I still suffered when I was being a good monk. "I'm a good monk, keep the rules, practice hard, do all the right things, yet I still suffer." I thought when I became a monk, I'd stop suffering if I did all the right things. This is an attachment, an attachment to somebody doing all the right things. This became apparent to me during the year that marked my sixth as a monk. I was proud of being such a good monk. I left Ajahn Chah that year and went off to this island in the gulf of Thailand. There was a monk there, a Tudong monk, whom I was recommended to see. He was supposed to show me a good place to go and practice, so I stayed with this monk for a while. Then I had to leave. I heard later that he told other monks that I wasn't a very good monk. I felt outraged. I wanted to go back and punch him in the nose. What was the cause? Attachment, wasn't it? It's an attachment, even to goodness. Attachment to ignorance, to even tradition, Theravada, Mahayana, or Thai forest tradition, or teachers, all these things can be attachments; dukkha results from attachments.  

The teaching of the Lord Buddha, the Four Noble Truths, and dependent origination are for you to contemplate, not for you to believe. I've been contemplating these over the years. I began to see for myself how much suffering I created for myself through attachment to ideals. Being an abbot of the monastery, for example, I took on responsibilities. I was attached to this idea of being responsible. Then I began to feel weighed down by this responsibility. At first it felt quite nice that I was now responsible for this monastery. After a while, when things weren't going all that well, there were problems and difficulties. Then you thought, "I've had enough, I want to leave. I've had enough responsibilities. I began to realize the suffering that was caused by attachment, even to something that's very good, that's right and responsible. I want to point out, though, that responsibility's not the problem, but attachment is; attachment is the cause of suffering. Once we really see and realize that for ourselves, then the insight helps us to let go. Letting go doesn't mean that I become irresponsible. It means that I don't suffer; I don't create suffering around responsibilities, and that's liberty of the mind. The mind's liberated, isn't it? From even the kind of tyranny of ideas that can easily turn one into a cynic.  

Dukkha is translated as suffering, but the more literal translation means "hard to bear." "Du" always implies some kind of negative thing, like suffering or difficulty, something not so good. I began to notice in my life that as a monk in Thailand, for example, life wasn't so hectic.  

Sometimes I thought I couldn't bear it anymore, but I was bearing it. You can't trust that voice that screams away. I realized at that moment, that's dukkha. I was creating dukkha. There was still the heat that was bearable if I could bear it. The suffering was, "I can't bear this." This comes through contemplation. This comes through listening to your inner voices that go on within yourself that say, "I don't like this person, I don't want that. It should be like this. That person should be like that. I'm fed up with this. I can't take anymore of that. I don't believe in it anymore." It's totally untrustworthy, and so recognizing that, realizing that for myself I could really see the difference between the way things are, which can be difficult, painful, unpleasant, unfair, unjust, atrocious even; all these are possible. We're all subject to being persecuted, abused, and treated badly, disrespected, humiliated; these are still possibilities that we will experience in our lifetimes. Is this the suffering that the Buddha was pointing to, or the suffering we create around this experience? This is the awakened mind, isn't it? To wake up to this is for you to suddenly realize for yourself: you don't have to suffer if you don't want to. It doesn't matter what's happening to you because often times you can't help that. You do have a choice in how you respond to it. This is liberty. Also, it is a kind of happiness to know that you're not just a helpless victim, you're not just caught in a trap, with no wisdom, no light at the end of the tunnel, just a black hole of despair. We have this potential for awakening, and that's always with us, in the present moment. So the more you contemplate this and appreciate this, you begin to really trust this.

There's nothing else to trust in this conditioned realm, it's going to change. The last that's going to change is the thing you wanted to change. We've got the end of the century, the millennium, the Y2K bug; we've got all kinds of things that are menacing and threatening to the future. We also have a huge population and very little wisdom, it seems. So it could be seen as what's wrong with the world? What's wrong with me? What's wrong with you? What's wrong with everything? To dwell, to attach to all those negative perceptions is the way to depression and despair. Then we can say, we won't, we'll just be positive, "It's all going to get better. The Golden Age, end of the century, end of the millennium, the Y2K will end up being a blessing and we'll have social harmony, political and economic harmony in the next millennium." It would certainly seem that it'd be wiser to attach to those things than negative ones; but in terms of wisdom, the reflective mind reflects both. The intuitive awareness of the human mind recognizes all conditions are impermanent, so you're actually tuning in, or awakening to reality through this practice of mindfulness, through this awareness, this awakening. This is the very essence of the Buddhadharma. It's very significant that the Buddha places sati, or mindfulness, as a focus, this awakened state of mind.

The word "Buddha" itself means the awakened one. It doesn't mean someone that just has their eyes open, because you can be caught in the whole deluded scenario of your own thoughts, with your eyes open, believing and committing actions on those beliefs. When you are really awake in the mind, you have the simple ability to pay attention to the present, to listen, to observe, to investigate, to contemplate, and to recognize through the guidance of the Lord Buddha's teachings. Buddhist teachings are very brilliant in that they point to the problems that we have, which are ignorance, desire and attachment. Once we awaken to the causes of suffering, we can be liberated; we can find our liberation from the bondage of attachment to the conditioned habits that we have, to our own thoughts, to our own social and cultural conditioning, to our own biases, views, prejudices, and to recognize the basic purity and oneness that we all share. Even within the limitations of our human state, no matter what state you're in right now, such as disability or lack of education, it's no obstruction in the conditioned realm unless you're determined to grasp it. So the obstructions are created through our own determined grasping, through not understanding.

The Buddha's teaching is most appropriate for this time, or any time really. However, particularly at this time when humanity does seem so lost, seem so caught in its own passion and obsessions, and so willing to destroy and exploit each other.

The world population is so enormous now; it'll probably double in the next fifty years. How are we going to live with each other? How are we going to share this planet with each other? If it's just based on ideas, or on domination of the strong over the weak, then that will just create endless suffering in the world. There is also this light at the end of the tunnel, which for me, is the Buddha's teaching. I chose this hope and direction in particular because the Buddhadharma was the only thing left. When I became a monk I found that the only thing I could be positive about was the Buddhadharma. Following that insight, it's been well worth it. It's been a great privilege, actually, to develop in this way. So I wanted to share this with you and to encourage all of you to recognize that this is something that we can all do. I'm not some kind of a special human being from Mars or Jupiter. I'm from Seattle, Washington; I'm a Seattlelite. So I offer this as a reflection for this afternoon.

 

▲Top


法界佛教總會Dharma Realm Buddhist Association │ © Vajra Bodhi Sea